More Violent? More Visceral?

My process has become a sort of disjointed rhythmic event.

It also seems through my automatic making of the paper cut outs I’ve lost the ability to analyse or predetermine the shapes I am cutting out.

I deliver automatic reactions to the paper with my my body. When or how can I free myself of this? Or is it already free?

The importance of shadow interplay and the dependance on light within my works appearance/documentation could resemble how the body is dependant on the vitality of our organs, but our organs do not depend on us.

An origin story has been lost as I have remained still in my process, not moving forward. I need to refocus on bodily items. It needs to be more identifiable. More grotesque more surgeon table, more bloody more alive. More absent. It needs to beat without a body since it’s vacated its former vessel.

I feel as if I must now form a more clear representation of a living abstraction and extraction.

By remaining process driven, I seem to have stagnated in whiteness. I now realise that the paper cut outs lack so much texture and so much colour that they remain in abstraction. But in this blank space is a vast nothingness, linking them only to what we know. I want to render subjectivity futile. This thing is moving out into an external world.

I don’t want to leave room for phycological interpretation. I want things to be abundantly more visceral.

To address a desire to be acknowledged by the viewer regarding the shapes and what they mean – I am now considering cutting more recognisable symbols into my work. Simon Periton introduces this sort of detailing in his paper cut outs. His scale is also something that interests me.

Simon Periton Knuckleduster II, 2003


Leave a comment